Blog Layout

Tackling the Challenges to make Missing Middle Housing Work

Part 3.

Making Missing Middle Housing Work Today

In Part 1 of this blog series, I reviewed what existed in many pre- and post-World War I neighborhoods and why the Missing Middle Housing types disappeared. In Part 2, I briefly describe the characteristics that make Missing Middle Housing a desirable way of living for many, whether they need affordable housing or not.


Now in Part 3, I look at the challenges in the way of bringing Missing Middle Housing to the neighborhoods and communities here in Florida, and across the country, that face desperate housing shortages and need more affordable housing options for the majority of their residents.


Barriers to the Missing Middle Housing Comeback


Now that we've explored the characteristics of Missing Middle Housing, both past and present, let's look at some of the reasons these neighborhoods have disappeared and the barriers that stand in the way of bringing this type of housing and community design back.


The reasons for why the Missing Middle has disappeared are many. The barriers that exist constitute a long list that the understanding of just a few of them and how to overcome those barriers could generate a renewal of Missing Middle Housing.


Here are the top 8 challenges that must be addressed if Missing Middle housing solutions are to move forward.


1. Zoning


Neighborhoods do exist in many communities across the country that have Missing Middle Housing. Most of these neighborhoods were created and built prior to the advent of zoning. Euclidian zoning (named after the Ohio village that initiated the use of divisions in the village based upon permitted uses) has been in place since the late 1920's. This type of zoning is created to separate zones such as single-family from multifamily and varies widely across the nation. Few communities have developed zoning that would allow for Missing Middle Housing on what could be single-family lots.


Euclidian zoning is a very large impediment for providing Missing Middle units. Very few zones providing for multifamily or medium density deny the possibility of providing for affordable housing types such as Missing Middle. Minimum lot size, setbacks, and maximum densities often negate the possibilities for anything but single-family or large multifamily units.


Zoning mapping is also a hindrance to providing the Missing Middle. In more than 75 percent of the residential zones in the United States it is illegal to build anything but a single-family home. The 2019
New York Times article bemoaned that the American Ideal of a house with a yard on every lot may be an impediment to affordable housing. With current zoning, most multi-family housing districts are on large lots and generally nowhere near walkable or transit that make Missing Middle possible.

2. Lot Size


The density of many lots zoned for either minimum lot size or development units per acre also restricts the possibility for inclusion of the Missing Middle. In other times, households would buy a small home and move up in size when it was needed or remain where they were if there was a status quo for their personal situation. Today, minimum lot size almost always dictates that a developer needs to build as large as the market will allow. This is also a result of the 1920's Euclidian zoning.

3. Fees


Impact fees, the fee charged by municipalities to developers to build their developments, often kills the opportunity for Missing Middle.


The big issue is that regardless of the size of the unit built, the cost is the same. Impact fees are the same whether you build 1,000 square feet or 10,000 square feet—keep in mind, this is not the case in all localities.


The cost of impact fees further restricts the opportunities for Missing Middle.


4. Parking Requirements


Along with the lot sizes, density requirements, setbacks, and the like, parking is a major detriment for Missing Middle. Off-street parking is often the killer of a developer’s proforma from being cost-effective. Zoning requirements for more than one space per unit with guest parking added, do not always reflect the real needs of the property or the neighborhood. These often unrealistic requirements deny the ability to develop Missing Middle where a developer can make a reasonable profit. In a perfect world, parking requirements would be determined by market conditions and not be mandated in zoning rules.


Onsite parking for more than one car per unit plus guest parking often obliterates the opportunity for infill development. Often there is not a development potential to make it financially viable. In many larger cities, infill housing is developed on large lots for this very reason.


5. NIMBY (Not in My Backyard)


Ranking high on the list of impediments to Missing Middle is NIMBYism.


The reason for NIMBYism is that single-family residents feel that their property values will go down because Missing Middle houses are sold based on a dollar per-square-foot basis. As such, Missing Middle housing on a per capita basis is usually an add to property values.


Smaller developers who would like to build in certain communities where NIMBYism is prevalent often turn away due to the protracted cost and time that it takes for approvals. In communities where zoning requires a public hearing, this can drag the approval process out over a year or more and the developer may still not get the entitlements to build.


Developers need to find ways to properly frame the conversations as to why Missing Middle can be an attribute to the neighborhood or adjacent neighborhood to allay the negative impacts of NIMBYism. Many communities across the country have found ways to frame the conversation so that there is not mass public opposition to a proposed Missing Middle development.

6. Regulations & Code


Let’s not forget the Fair Housing Act (FHA)! Any development of four or more units requires compliance with the Fair Housing Act. Along with the FHA, the building code can have an impact. If you exceed more units than a duplex, the residential code is set aside for the full building code. The International Building Code requires a more expensive and restrictive set of regulations than the International Residential Code.



7. Costs & Profit


Likely one of the biggest impediments is perceived costs that do not enable Missing Middle development. Margins for developers of small projects are recognizably smaller for small projects, while costs may be about the same as a large project. Small condo projects have severe impacts from liability and construction defect laws. Getting financing to build small condos is also a draw-back, not to mention buyers getting financing to purchase in small condo communities. Setting up a condo board on a small project also hinders its creation.


8. Emerging Opportunities 


Focus by large-scale builders do not have Missing Middle as a part of their portfolio. Why? Likely because for the past 100 years or so, these types of units have been illegal or not provided for in the zoning laws. With the help of groups like the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and the Congress on New Urbanism (CNU), there is an opportunity to begin a small-scale product development forum to bring not only small developers but hopefully the “big guys” into the conversation. Many of the big builders have found that providing townhouses for rent is a viable market. Perhaps the work of ULI and CNU can lead creative solutions to enable the Missing Middle.



What's next?

In upcoming articles, I'll continue to share insights into Missing Middle housing solutions. We will look at the relatively new concept of “pattern zoning” and the potential it has to enable the creation of Missing Middle districts in our communities.


I'll also go into details about what the density might look like in Mixed Middle Housing neighborhoods, and the barriers to making Missing Middle part of the housing solution.


I hope you continue to follow the blog.



About the author: Greg Burke, FAIA, NCARB is a St. Augustine, Florida based architect with more than 40 years in the profession and the President of Gregory John Burke | ARCHITECT, PA. He is licensed to practice in seven states. He has been an ardent proponent of solving the affordability issue for housing and currently advises to the St. Johns County (Florida) Affordable Housing Advisory Council. He is also a member of the Florida Board of Architecture and Interior Design

Modern home with palm trees in front of it.
By Crystal Wimperis 28 Mar, 2024
Greg Burke talks about how the tools he uses in the design process that is valuable to clients.
a red car is parked in front of a yellow and white building
By Crystal Wimperis 19 Mar, 2024
Architect Greg Burke explains why managing a project's risk is a critical step that is valuable to our clients.
By Crystal Wimperis 08 Dec, 2023
Architect Greg Burke talks about how his architecture started, what he's learned along the way, and the values that guide his work today.
By Crystal Wimperis 04 Oct, 2023
Learn more about how architect Greg Burke, FAIA can bring the value and expertise you need to your architectural project!
A row of typical older midwest city houses.
12 Jun, 2023
As I have discussed in previous blogs on Missing Middle housing, the term refers to diverse and attainable housing options that fit between single-family homes and large scale, high-density apartment buildings. Missing Middle has been with us for more than 100 years, but zoning beginning in the late 1920's restricted the ability to develop this type of project in most U.S. cities. Along with restrictive zoning, a general misunderstanding of Missing Middle housing has caused local communities to question its impact on property values to surrounding single-family homes. Such confusion has stalled or even halted developments from moving forward, even in communities that are in desperate need of attainable housing for rent or for sale.
Aerial view of city neighborhood with various types of apartments and houses.
25 May, 2023
The use of pattern zoning can be the key to making Missing Middle succeed, offering a variety of building types that can enhance neighborhood quality, walkable areas, and a better quality of life.
Architecture rendering of proposed mixed-use buildings in a town center.
13 Oct, 2022
Why do Missing Middle neighborhoods work so well? How does a type of housing made popular in the first half of the 20th century answer the 21st century housing crisis?
Missing Middle Residential Development with parking lot and pond.
15 Jul, 2022
In this article, I go into what Missing Middle Housing is, its history, and why it's the ideal solution to solving America's affordable housing crisis.
Small group of people seated at a table.
By Bryon McCartney 16 Feb, 2022
When my friend Andrew Favata of BACI Advisors posted on LinkedIn the "Top 5 Mistakes Owners Make" in developing their projects, it prompted me to share my recommendations based on my own 40+ years of experience working on a range of projects from extremely small and straightforward to large complex corporate projects. Whether you are contemplating a porch addition or you are a corporate officer or facilities manager, the missteps and their solutions are equal. It’s just a matter of magnitude in time and dollars. In this article, I will mostly address the smaller projects. More about those really big projects in another post. Misstep No. 1: "Assembling the Wrong Project Team and People." You would think that this is a no-brainer. For small projects this may actually be a bigger issue than for larger projects. Corporations have facilities managers who perform this task and are charged with keeping the corporations from making this and the other four mistakes. But small project owners have to do everything themselves - right? What should the small project owner do? Enlist someone they trust in helping put a team together Interview several firms needed to design and construct the building Review the resumes of the individuals who will design and build the project Ensure continuity of the team Misstep No. 2: "Insufficient Planning Without the End Goal in Mind." When you consider building something there is usually some semblance of a goal in mind. Again, the larger projects have the advantage in that there is a team of people who have done a lot of homework (architects call it Programming), identifying goals and objectives of meeting the resultant building’s image, function, and life-cycle operation. What should the small project owner do? Put together the right team who can provide the best direction for your project Work closely with architect or construction manager to develop a proper Program Don’t think this omission will save time and money - it won’t A recent prospective church client came to me with two pre-engineered heavy-timber structural system buildings designed by the heavy-timber fabricator. The fabricator was also asked to basically design the building, EVEN though they informed the client that they were not architects. Both buildings were to be two stories in height with people occupied second floors. There was no elevator, toilet rooms did not meet the building code and in general, the building was not well designed. The church representative already had hired a civil engineer to design the site and locate the buildings without the aid of an architect. One of the two buildings did not orient itself to the site in the best method for energy efficiency. Putting the WHOLE team together before starting one aspect of a design will save time, money and headaches. Misstep No. 3: "Creating Inaccurate Budgets." This mistake takes on exponential impacts, especially if you have made Missteps 1 and 2. What should the small project owner do? • Employ the professionals in developing your budget • If budget exceeds funds, adjust the scope of the project • Allow for a contingency fund, especially for early budgeting (usually 20% above budget) Misstep No. 4: "Underestimating the Time Involved and Missing Deadlines." This mistake can have dire consequences. Every project needs a realistic schedule as well as a budget. Architects and construction managers develop schedules with milestone dates for the completion of the design and construction. The ancient Chinese proverb that a man will never arrive at his destination if he doesn’t know where he is going applies here. The schedule IS the road map. What should the small project owner do? With the professionals, develop a realistic schedule Understand that the schedule impacts the quality of construction Understand - accelerated schedules have cost impacts Take into account climatic conditions that can affect the schedule Misstep No. 5: "Managing a New Project While Running Their Main Business." Because the large projects have staffs that are tasked with performing the management on the owner’s behalf, this misstep more likely happens on smaller projects than large. What should the small project owner do? If the budget can accommodate - hire a professional to represent your interests Meet regularly with your representative - have an update schedule Insist that written progress reports be submitted to you for approval By assembling the right team and right people to execute your vision, will allow you to continue to do what you are good at doing. Rely on the team you have assembled. They will likely ensure your success and if they do their job properly, make you look like the "smartest person on the block." Avoiding the "5 Missteps" will not totally guarantee that your project will move smoothly along without bumps in the road. But avoiding these slip-ups will ensure that you will spend less time, money, and sanity on getting the building constructed. No one can predict when a natural disaster will impact your project. Or, will the market tumble, affecting your bottom line? However I can be one-hundred percent accurate that if you make any of the errors outlined above, you will adversely impact your schedule, money, or sanity. Or all three. Greg Burke, FAIA
Illustration of proposed home design.
28 Jan, 2022
As an architect, I am often asked by potential new clients to assist them with a project they have in mind. They usually come to me with no real idea of the needs for hiring an architect. In many of the cases, the potential client has not had any experience with a building project and has no idea of what needs to be done before they hire their architect. So, what has to happen before you hire your architect?  Understand that you and your architect are going to be joined at the hip in executing your vision of what you want designed. First, do some research, that may sound daunting, but in the age of everything is on line, it’s not that hard. It’s easy to find out what architects design the type of projects you are going to build. Use the usual search engines by performing searches like “residential architects near me” if you are looking to have a house designed. Once you get a list of potential architects, visit their website. The website will show you the type of projects they execute. Take a good look at the projects, but also look at the area devoted to the firm itself. Some firms will tell you the process they use to design. Others will give a sketch bio or possibly even detailed bios of the firm leaders and staff. They may also tell you about the awards they have received if this is something that interests you. As you review the various architecture firm websites, it’s a good idea to know your objectives and goals for the project. If you have stylistic concerns for your project, have a few graphic images (photos) of what you like. Compare those images to what the architect’s website shows. Is your vision a fit with what that architect designs? Some architects have a very specific style. Others will work with what your desires are. Determine this by closely observing their projects on the website. Now, based on what you've seen and read about these architects, make a list of three or four architects that you may want to contact.
Show More
Share by: